Solar & Battery

LONGi vs AIKO: which solar panels are better?

The two back-contact panels we fit, compared on their datasheets: efficiency, size, shade, looks and warranty, and which one suits your roof.

By the Eco2u NW team·Published ·5 min read

Black solar panels on the roof of a stone house in green countryside

The short answer

Both are top-end panels, and at the 530 W size we fit they are very close. The AIKO Neostar 3S+ is slightly more efficient, a little smaller and lighter, has a black frame and a 25-year product warranty. The LONGi Hi-MO X10 matches it on heat performance and on the 30-year output guarantee, and it’s the panel our packages are built on. Choose AIKO if the look of your roof matters most; otherwise either is a sound choice, and your roof’s layout matters more than the badge.

LONGi and AIKO are the two panel makers we fit, and once people have done their research they often ask which is better. Here is how the two compare on the manufacturers’ own datasheets, what the differences mean on a British roof, and which we’d choose.

LONGi vs AIKO at a glance

Model we fit

LONGi: Hi-MO X10, LR7-60HVD-530M

AIKO: Neostar 3S+60, AIKO-A530-MCE60Db

Cell technology

LONGi: HPBC 2.0 back contact, N-type

AIKO: ABC (All Back Contact), N-type

Efficiency at 530 W

LONGi: 23.5%

AIKO: 23.9%

Size

LONGi: 1990 × 1134 × 30 mm

AIKO: 1954 × 1134 × 30 mm

Weight

LONGi: 28 kg

AIKO: 27.1 kg

Output lost per °C above 25 °C

LONGi: 0.26%

AIKO: 0.26%

Build

LONGi: Dual glass, bifacial

AIKO: Dual glass, bifacial, black frame

Shade (maker's claim)

LONGi: Anti-shading cells, designed to stop shaded cells overheating

AIKO: Partial shading optimisation

Hail test

LONGi: 25 mm hailstones at 23 m/s

AIKO: 35 mm hailstones at 23 m/s

Output guarantee

LONGi: 30 years, at least 88.85% in year 30

AIKO: 30 years, at least 88.85% in year 30

Product warranty

LONGi: 25 years on LONGi's European datasheet, 15 in its latest global warranty

AIKO: 25 years

Checked against LONGi’s and AIKO’s datasheets for the 530 W versions in October 2026. Manufacturers update their ranges and warranty terms, so we confirm the exact model and warranty in your quote.

What is a back-contact solar panel?

Look closely at most solar panels and you’ll see thin silver lines across every cell. Those lines collect the electricity, but they also sit in the way of the light. A back-contact panel moves all of that wiring to the back of the cell, so the whole front face can catch light.

That does two things. More of each cell is working, which is where the higher efficiency comes from, and the panel looks plainer from the street, with no grid of silver lines.

HPBC 2.0 (LONGi’s Hybrid Passivated Back Contact, second generation) and ABC (AIKO’s All Back Contact) are each maker’s own version of the idea, and both use N-type silicon cells. Both makers publish figures claiming their back-contact panels produce more than conventional panels of the same size. Those come from their own tests and simulations, so treat them as a direction rather than a promise.

What actually matters on a UK roof

Efficiency, if your roof is small

Efficiency tells you how much power you get from each square metre of panel. It matters most when roof space is the limit, as it is on plenty of terraces and semis. At 530 W, AIKO’s panel is 23.9% efficient and LONGi’s is 23.5%, because the AIKO is 36 mm shorter for the same power. Across twelve panels that’s about half a square metre less roof. It’s a real difference, but a small one: whether an extra panel fits usually comes down to the shape of your roof, vents, skylights and edge clearances, which is what the design is for.

Shade

Chimneys, dormers and trees cast shadows across part of a panel. Both makers say their cells cope better with partial shade: LONGi says its panels resist shading losses and are designed to stop shaded cells overheating, and AIKO lists partial shading optimisation as a core feature. These are manufacturer claims, and neither panel turns a badly shaded roof into a good one. We run a year-round shading analysis on every design in OpenSolar, so you see the effect of your own chimney or tree before you commit.

Heat

Panels produce a little less as they warm up. Both lose 0.26% of their output for every degree above 25 °C, so there’s nothing between them here.

Looks

Neither panel has gridlines on the front. The Neostar adds a black frame, and if the look of the roof is your priority, it’s the one we’d suggest.

Bifacial: not a deciding factor on a pitched roof

Both are dual-glass bifacial panels, so the back can turn reflected light into power too. That depends on light reaching the back of the panel, which happens far more on flat roofs and ground mounts than on a panel sitting close to a pitched roof. It’s not a reason to pick one over the other for a house.

Warranty

The output guarantees are identical: at least 99% of rated power in the first year, falling by no more than 0.35% a year after that, to at least 88.85% in year 30. On the product warranty, which covers faults in materials and manufacture, AIKO gives 25 years. LONGi’s European datasheet for this panel also says 25 years, but its latest global warranty document says 15, so we confirm the terms that apply to your panels in writing with your quote. Our own 10-year workmanship warranty sits on top of either.

Which is better, LONGi or AIKO?

  • On the datasheet at 530 W: AIKO, narrowly. Slightly more efficient, a little smaller and lighter, tested with bigger hailstones (35 mm against 25 mm), and a 25-year product warranty.
  • On output in real life: very close. The same heat performance, the same 30-year output guarantee, and an efficiency gap of under half a percentage point.
  • On looks: AIKO, with its black frame.
  • On our packages: every package is built on LONGi, and AIKO can be specified in its place.

What about Jinko Tiger Neo?

We also see people searching for “AIKO Neostar vs Jinko Tiger Neo” and “LONGi vs Jinko”. Jinko makes good panels too. We fit LONGi and AIKO, so those are the two we compare here and the two we stand behind on your roof.

Our verdict

You won’t go wrong with either. If you want the cleanest look, or your roof is tight and every bit of efficiency counts, go AIKO. If not, LONGi does the job just as well in practice, with the same heat performance and the same 30-year output guarantee. Our technical solar designer can lay out both on your roof and talk you through the difference in panel count and yearly generation on a video call, before you decide.

More detail on each: LONGi Hi-MO X10 and AIKO Neostar 3S+.

Questions people ask us

Is LONGi or AIKO better?

At the 530 W size we fit, they're very close. AIKO's Neostar 3S+ is slightly more efficient (23.9% against 23.5%), a little smaller and lighter, and has a black frame. LONGi's Hi-MO X10 matches it on heat performance and on the 30-year output guarantee, and the layout of your roof makes more difference than the brand.

What is the difference between HPBC and ABC solar cells?

They're two makers' versions of the same idea. HPBC 2.0 is LONGi's back-contact cell and ABC (All Back Contact) is AIKO's. Both move the wiring to the back of the cell, so the front catches more light and shows no gridlines.

Which has the longer warranty, LONGi or AIKO?

Both guarantee at least 88.85% of rated output in year 30. AIKO's product warranty is 25 years. LONGi's is 25 years on its European datasheet but 15 in its latest global warranty, so we confirm the terms for your panels in your quote.

Are back-contact solar panels better in shade?

LONGi and AIKO both say their back-contact cells lose less when part of a panel is shaded. That is a manufacturer claim, and no panel fixes a heavily shaded roof, which is why we check shading across the whole year in your design.

How we design your system
Are AIKO Neostar panels all black?

The Neostar 3S+ we fit has a black frame and no gridlines on the front, which is why we suggest it when the look of the roof matters most.

AIKO Neostar 3S+
Can I have AIKO panels instead of LONGi?

Yes. Our packages are built on LONGi panels, and AIKO can be specified in their place. We confirm which panel is going on your roof before you commit.

Solar panels and battery storage

Read next

Not sure which battery suits your home?

Our technical solar designer will design both options for your roof and talk you through the numbers on a video call. No pressure, no obligation.

More from the blog

Video From Recent Installs

Real installs, in the customer’s own words

Filmed by our team on recent jobs. You see the actual array on the actual roof, the inverter and battery on the wall, and the system that was specified for that property.

No stock footage and no actors, just what went in, why they chose Eco2u, and what it is doing for their bills, from the people living with it every day.

Get your free online quote
  • 17 × 465W panels
  • Hanchu 5kW inverter
  • 9.2 kWh battery

“I wanted to support the production of clean energy and save money.”

  • South-facing roof
  • Fox 5kW inverter
  • Fox EP12 · 12 kWh

“We've got a south-facing roof, so I've decided to put solar on the roof.”

  • 12 × 530W panels
  • Sigenergy 6kW inverter
  • SigenStor · 10 kWh

Why we like it: A great system because you can stack on more batteries as and when required.